<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Brand Communications from RT &#187; email communications</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rtmedia.com/blog/tag/email-communications/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rtmedia.com/blog</link>
	<description>Brand and marketing insights from the team at RT</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 11:57:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Serious about Social Media</title>
		<link>http://rtmedia.com/blog/2010/04/21/getting-serious-about-social-media/</link>
		<comments>http://rtmedia.com/blog/2010/04/21/getting-serious-about-social-media/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 18:02:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ross</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[email marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brand communications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[customer loyalty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[customer service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[email communications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GetShaking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rtmedia.com/blog/?p=560</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We have launched a new division to support companies who are serious about unlocking digital marketing and social media channels within their marketing mix. GetShaking was brought about via the concept of people shaking hands by way of an introduction. This is, in essence, what social media allows people to do far more effectively than [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>We have launched a new division to support companies who are serious about unlocking digital marketing and social media channels within their marketing mix.</strong></p>
<p><strong><a  rel="attachment wp-att-558" href="http://rtmedia.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/getshaking_logo.jpg" target="_blank" class="thickbox no_icon" title="getshaking_logo"><img class="alignleft" title="getshaking_logo" src="http://rtmedia.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/getshaking_logo.jpg" alt="GetShaking Integrated Strategic Digital Marketing" width="289" height="170" /></a></strong><a  href="http://www.GetShaking.co.uk" target="_blank">GetShaking</a> was brought about via the concept of people shaking hands by way of an introduction. This is, in essence, what social media allows people to do far more effectively than real-world, cross-globe travels to meet and introduce yourself.</p>
<p>We have a dedicated team of passionate, motivated and highly experienced marketing professionals who care about getting the right result for you! From email and internet marketing, to design and copywriting, through web development and strategic consultancy, <a  href="http://www.getshaking.co.uk/" target="_blank">GetShaking</a> are the people that will help you fulfil your social media management and email marketing, ensuring success. We’d rather you went away with too many ideas and action points than not enough, because we know that communication coupled with an understanding of your business requirements are vital in getting the right marketing mix for you. We believe in marketing that builds relationships. Our focus is on your strategy and the ongoing support of that, because we know that short-term activity might get the quick sale or result, but it won&#8217;t maintain the result or lead to sustainable success or business growth.</p>
<p><a  rel="attachment wp-att-559" href="http://rtmedia.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/getshaking_ebob.jpg" target="_blank" class="thickbox no_icon" title="getshaking_ebob"><img class="alignleft" title="getshaking_ebob" src="http://rtmedia.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/getshaking_ebob.jpg" alt="eBob - GetShaking's Integrated Strategic Digital Marketing icon" width="203" height="165" /></a>In keeping with our unique and effective offering, E-Bob, <a  href="http://www.getshaking.co.uk/" target="_blank">GetShaking</a>’s purple-faced character was developed by our in-house illustrators.</p>
<p>We currently have a diverse cross section of clients who are enjoying full success from our work on their internet presence. From established solicitors to experienced car body maintenance companies, all our <a  href="http://www.getshaking.co.uk/" target="_blank">GetShaking</a> clients have committed to ongoing contracts as they have seen rapid results from the work we have undertaken for them.<strong></strong></p>
<p><strong>Are you engaged in online marketing but don’t know if you have reached your maximum potential?</strong><strong> For a limited time only, we are offering a free audit. We will look at your current online activity and evaluate the positives and highlight where there is room for improvement. The audit comes with no obligation – but will ultimately help you making the right decisions for your future activity.</strong></p>
<p>Visit <a  href="http://www.GetShaking.co.uk">www.GetShaking.co.uk</a> for more information and to arrange your free audit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rtmedia.com/blog/2010/04/21/getting-serious-about-social-media/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Maximizing the deliverability of your email marketing</title>
		<link>http://rtmedia.com/blog/2009/11/03/maximizing-the-deliverability-of-your-e-communications/</link>
		<comments>http://rtmedia.com/blog/2009/11/03/maximizing-the-deliverability-of-your-e-communications/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 09:31:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Darryl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[email marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Expert Advice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[email communications]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rtmedia.com/blog/?p=393</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Getting the highest percentage of your messages to your subscribers’ Inbox is one of the primary goals from an email marketing perspective. At the same time, it is also the main hurdle to overcome. Innumerable little things can effect whether or not your communications end up in the inbox, or in the junk mail folder [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Getting the highest percentage of your messages to your subscribers’ Inbox is one of the primary goals from an email marketing perspective. At the same time, it is also the main hurdle to overcome. Innumerable little things can effect whether or not your communications end up in the inbox, or in the junk mail folder of your recipients. The job is made even more difficult as different Internet Service Providers (ISPs) and email clients have very different rules, filters, procedures and policies on bulk email.</p>
<p>The success of any campaign is influenced by all areas of the process, requiring the close co-operation of everyone from the IT/Server guys to the designers and database handlers.</p>
<p>One of the main contributing factors to the failure of a campaign can be the number of hard bounces and complaint rates. AOL, one of the world’s largest ISPs, recommends maintaining a &lt;0.1% complaint rate. That’s a threshold of 1 in every 1,000 emails that you send out. That may sound harsh, but by adhering to some rules it’s entirely possible.</p>
<p>Even if you beat the spam filter there is no guarantee that your mail will ever be read. Finicky recipients who are unhappy at having received your mail may just click that “Report as spam” button. On local email clients the effect is minimal, but on web-based services like Hotmail or Google Mail, this can have a serious knock on effect for other recipients on the same service as these are tracked, recorded and taken into consideration in future (as if you didn’t have enough to worry about already).</p>
<p>Over the next few weeks I will cover some of the specific problems that the aspiring email marketer would encounter during the course of a campaign, from set up through to the post-send fallout. For this first part we will look at where it all begins: your server and domain.</p>
<p><span id="more-393"></span><strong>Server and Domain</strong></p>
<p>Server and domain processes and configuration will mainly be of use to if you are running marketing software on your own server.</p>
<p>There are a few things to consider when taking the step to set up your own email-marketing server, starting with the IP address. Having a static IP address to send email from your server is a great way to build your reputation as a trusted sender. The closer you keep to rules, the better your reputation. The better your reputation, the better your deliverability. It’s as simple as that.</p>
<p>In addition to your IP address, there are a couple of processes and frameworks that can be utilized to help your emails along the way.</p>
<p>The first, and probably most popular of these, is an Open Source project called the Sender Policy Framework (SPF). SPF allows the owner of a domain to specify their mail sending policy. The information is published to their Domain Name Server (DNS) in the form of an SPF Record which contains specific instructions for the receiving server, telling it which mail servers can send outgoing mail on it’s behalf.</p>
<p>When the inbound server receives the mail, the SPF Record is checked against the senders mail server for consistency. This speeds up the process of receiving and decreases the load on the server, allowing more mail to be processed in a shorter amount of time. If the records match, it is put through a less stringent spam-check process and then passed onto the recipient. Conversely, if the records do not match and the email is being sent from an unauthorized source, it will be put through a more rigorous checking process and will more than likely be trashed.</p>
<p>Another similar process is the Sender ID framework, a project initially spearheaded by Microsoft. While similar in action to SPF, the fundamental difference was that Sender ID could verify the IP address of the server that has sent the mail, compares it to the Sender ID record, and then deals with it appropriately. (Currently, both frameworks now support this.)</p>
<p>The final authorization process is known as Domain Keys Identified Mail (DKIM), which uses public-key cryptography to digitally sign all emails. The inbound server then checks this public-key for verification.  This process is of particular importance when sending email to GMail accounts, and is recommended if a large amount of GMail addresses are present in your recipient database.  To use Domain keys, a third party software package or proxy must be implemented on your mail server.</p>
<p>All of the above methods do require either a working knowledge of DNS records or server changes, and care should always be taken when making changes to such settings &#8211; as it’s very easy to break something if you don’t know what you’re doing (best to get a professional to do it for you). It’s also worth noting that currently, not all domain registrars support SPF or Sender ID but they are quickly gaining in popularity and in the future the option to have them will surely be offered as default. If you are not sure if your domain supports it, check with your registrar’s technical support.</p>
<p>That’s it from me this week. Check back soon where I will cover off how to keep your database clean, relevant and minty fresh!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rtmedia.com/blog/2009/11/03/maximizing-the-deliverability-of-your-e-communications/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Using the “TO” and “CC” to send mass emails – bad, bad etiquette</title>
		<link>http://rtmedia.com/blog/2009/11/02/using-the-%e2%80%9cto%e2%80%9d-and-%e2%80%9ccc%e2%80%9d-to-send-mass-emails-%e2%80%93-bad-bad-etiquette/</link>
		<comments>http://rtmedia.com/blog/2009/11/02/using-the-%e2%80%9cto%e2%80%9d-and-%e2%80%9ccc%e2%80%9d-to-send-mass-emails-%e2%80%93-bad-bad-etiquette/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 13:34:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ross</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[email marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[email communications]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rtmedia.com/blog/?p=399</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I give up… I am consistently disappointed in people’s inability to treat email addresses with due care and attention. I feel compelled to write a post about this as I have received yet another email with over 50 confidential addresses including mine in the “CC” tool from outlook over the weekend. Now everyone can see [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I give up… I am consistently disappointed in people’s inability to treat email addresses with due care and attention. I feel compelled to write a post about this as I have received yet another email with over 50 confidential addresses including mine in the “CC” tool from outlook over the weekend. Now everyone can see that persons email address book that they chose to send their email message update to. Bonkers!<br />
Fine if you must for internal company messages but to multiple suppliers, clients and such it’s just bad practice. For people with years of experience I see them repeat offending and it gets my goat. Please, please if you must use outlook to send your mass communications then please use the blind carbon copy at least. Phew that’s off my chest – now back to work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rtmedia.com/blog/2009/11/02/using-the-%e2%80%9cto%e2%80%9d-and-%e2%80%9ccc%e2%80%9d-to-send-mass-emails-%e2%80%93-bad-bad-etiquette/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>E-mailitis</title>
		<link>http://rtmedia.com/blog/2008/04/24/e-mailitis/</link>
		<comments>http://rtmedia.com/blog/2008/04/24/e-mailitis/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 17:31:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Just for fun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[21st century communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[email communications]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rtmedia.com/blog/?p=103</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Have you become addicted to email, does it manage your time in the office? Some organisations have banned email internally to encourage better communication between their people. True, bad things can happen because of email, but good things also happen because of email, what&#8217;s in no doubt in the 21st century is that just about [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you become addicted to email, does it manage your time in the<a  href="http://rtmedia.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/04/email_in_bottle.jpg" class="thickbox no_icon" title="email_in_bottle"><img class="alignright alignnone size-medium wp-image-104" style="float: right;" title="email_in_bottle" src="http://rtmedia.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/04/email_in_bottle-232x300.jpg" alt="" width="232" height="300" /></a> office?</p>
<p>Some organisations have banned email internally to encourage better communication between their people.</p>
<p>True, bad things can happen because of email, but good things also happen because of email, what&#8217;s in no doubt in the 21st century is that just about everything happens by email.  But should it?  There are still many instances when it&#8217;s better to telephone, fax, text or even meet!</p>
<p>It is doubtful that any email ever added to a relationship, but I bet it&#8217;s spoiled a few! Think before you click!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rtmedia.com/blog/2008/04/24/e-mailitis/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

